Pathophysiology of Disease

5 Responses to “Pathophysiology of Disease”

1. Brian J. Reynolds says:

   April 30, 2010 at 7:48 pm

   I appreciate the promptness with which your company sends its products out, and I also appreciate that they remain in the new shape up on arrival to me. Thank You. One drawback I have seen to your site is that when you end up being late sending an item there are times when you back the date up for several more weeks, which when your a student you need these books to arrive as soon as possible to keep up with reading assignments.
   Rating: 5 / 5
2. zymluv says:

   April 30, 2010 at 9:50 pm

   Execellent service. I am hundred percent satisfied and will buy from this person again. Thanks.
   Rating: 1 / 5
3. Dr. Claudio A.G.Monteiro Filho. says:

   April 30, 2010 at 10:28 pm

   Hi there first of all I want to say that I am from Brazil, Recife, Pernambuco. I went to a university called UPE, FESP which is in the north east part of Brazil. I bought this book because I plotting that it would complement BRS pathology?
   But it really didn?t so as I plotting that it would;
   I mean it does but its like discussing too much one some points so its just not really a excellent book for the USMLE step1 prep; I was really led to reckon that because of something I had read on the first aid book that said that ?
   Really did not like the book at all for the usmle prep. Although you can see that it?s a very well made book and they place their hearts into making it but it?s just not excellent enough for the boards.
   It?s not serving me any excellent I barely opened it since I bought it and I got their latest edition it was sort of a waste of money for me? I reckon that this book might be of value for the students at UCSF that are taking classes on introduction to medicine or something like that?
   But for the usmle? Forget it?!!!
   It?s really confusing, and there are no simple index for a particular disease, meaning If you look for something in specific it will be correlated with some many things that you wont see it aptly there; there won?t be simple diseases listed there for you to look at like that?
   Every time I go look for something its not there or it?s in contest with something else makes you loose so much time looking at it to find it? It?s a very excellent book but not to be used as a complement to BRS pathology unless you?re taking the class.
   Hope that this was of help to some of you?
   Dr.Claudio A.G.Monteiro Filho.
   Rating: 2 / 5
4. Enthusiastic Reader says:

   April 30, 2010 at 11:11 pm

   I found the book vague and unclear. It was not compulsory as a “reference” book for a graduate level pathophysiology course and it was the first book I returned. There are several other books on pathophysiology that are on the market for about the same price or a bit more that are MUCH more thorough and helpful for undergraduate, graduate or medical student reference. I would NOT urge this book for anyone looking at any type of indepth medical in rank.
   Rating: 2 / 5
5. JMTG says:

   April 30, 2010 at 11:14 pm

   This book is the benchmark of terrible textbooks. I refuse to judge the text ever saw an editor before it went into print; the authors – especially McPhee himself – wouldn’t be able to recognize DIDACTICS if it came flying into his face; the text is extremely convulted written, confusing, unstructured, concepts are never connected, void of clarity, and in many instances just honest out incorrect or self-contradictory; the book has no aim of really conveying knowledge, instead it keeps digging into itself.

   Also, do not judge the other reviewers who give this book 5 stars, they are not actual persons, but agencies paid by the publishers. Or, as I cannot really attest to that, be enough to say anyone taking medical didactics sincerely simply cannot reward this book 5 stars.
   Rating: 1 / 5